<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (5.2.4#845-sha1:c9f4cc41abe72fb236945343a1f485c2c844dac9) at Fri May 24 06:30:33 CDT 2013

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary add field=key&field=summary to the URL of your request.
For example:
http://www.couchbase.com/issues/si/jira.issueviews:issue-xml/RCBC-102/RCBC-102.xml?field=key&field=summary
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Couchbase</title>
    <link>http://www.couchbase.com/issues</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>5.2.4</version>
        <build-number>845</build-number>
        <build-date>26-12-2012</build-date>
    </build-info>

<item>
            <title>[RCBC-102] Store methods behaves inconsistently when persistence constraints specified</title>
                <link>http://www.couchbase.com/issues/browse/RCBC-102</link>
                <project id="10048" key="RCBC">Couchbase Ruby client library</project>
                        <description>The Bucket#set for example should return the object corresponding to arguments passed:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1.9.3p327 (main):002:0&amp;gt; conn.set(&amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;bar&amp;quot;)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;851339802448297984&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1.9.3p327 (main):003:0&amp;gt; conn.set(&amp;quot;foo&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;bar&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;baz&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;{&amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;=&amp;gt;2995536636664938496, &amp;quot;baz&amp;quot;=&amp;gt;16831440216388861952}&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
But when :observe option is used, it always return it like for multi-set&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1.9.3p327 (main):004:0&amp;gt; conn.set(&amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;bar&amp;quot;, :observe =&amp;gt; {:persisted =&amp;gt; 1})&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;{&amp;quot;foo&amp;quot;=&amp;gt;2559248876759744512}&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
</description>
                <environment></environment>
            <key id="21343">RCBC-102</key>
            <summary>Store methods behaves inconsistently when persistence constraints specified</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="http://www.couchbase.com/issues/images/icons/issuetypes/bug.png">Bug</type>
                                <priority id="3" iconUrl="http://www.couchbase.com/issues/images/icons/priorities/major.png">Major</priority>
                    <status id="6" iconUrl="http://www.couchbase.com/issues/images/icons/statuses/closed.png">Closed</status>
                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                    <security id="10011">Public</security>
                        <assignee username="avsej">Sergey Avseyev</assignee>
                                <reporter username="avsej">Sergey Avseyev</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:19:57 -0600</created>
                <updated>Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:15:14 -0600</updated>
                    <resolved>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:26:04 -0600</resolved>
                            <version>1.2.0</version>
                                <fixVersion>1.2.1</fixVersion>
                                                <votes>0</votes>
                        <watches>0</watches>
                                                    <comments>
                    <comment id="46054" author="avsej" created="Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:23:51 -0600"  >&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.couchbase.org/23336&quot;&gt;http://review.couchbase.org/23336&lt;/a&gt;</comment>
                    <comment id="46056" author="ingenthr" created="Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:55:53 -0600"  >that does seem to be an issue&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
you&amp;#39;re a better judge than I am, but I&amp;#39;d think we&amp;#39;d want the response to be the same whether or not using the :observe&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
If the change makes it more consistent, then yes it&amp;#39;s an API change from 1.2.0 but it&amp;#39;s really getting back to what we expect so perfectly acceptable.  Definitely something to release note though.</comment>
                </comments>
                    <attachments>
                </attachments>
            <subtasks>
        </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10010" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:multicheckboxes">
                <customfieldname>Flagged</customfieldname>
                <customfieldvalues>
                        <customfieldvalue key="10010"><![CDATA[Release Note]]></customfieldvalue>
    
                </customfieldvalues>
            </customfield>
                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10081" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                <customfieldvalues>
                    <customfieldvalue>8721</customfieldvalue>
                </customfieldvalues>
            </customfield>
                                                                                    <customfield id="customfield_10181" key="com.atlassian.jira.ext.charting:timeinstatus">
                <customfieldname>Time In Status</customfieldname>
                <customfieldvalues>
                    
                </customfieldvalues>
            </customfield>
                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>