<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (5.2.4#845-sha1:c9f4cc41abe72fb236945343a1f485c2c844dac9) at Sun May 19 19:48:20 CDT 2013

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary add field=key&field=summary to the URL of your request.
For example:
http://www.couchbase.com/issues/si/jira.issueviews:issue-xml/JCBC-245/JCBC-245.xml?field=key&field=summary
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Couchbase</title>
    <link>http://www.couchbase.com/issues</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>5.2.4</version>
        <build-number>845</build-number>
        <build-date>26-12-2012</build-date>
    </build-info>

<item>
            <title>[JCBC-245] Docs: Javadoc states that a java.lang.String is required for the value in a write operation, whereas online docs state object</title>
                <link>http://www.couchbase.com/issues/browse/JCBC-245</link>
                <project id="10080" key="JCBC">Couchbase Java Client</project>
                        <description>Java docs here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.couchbase.com/autodocs/couchbase-java-client-1.1.2/&quot;&gt;http://www.couchbase.com/autodocs/couchbase-java-client-1.1.2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
All set/replace/add/cas operations state something like:&lt;br/&gt;
cas(java.lang.String key, long cas, java.lang.String value, PersistTo req)&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Whereas the docs here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.couchbase.com/docs/couchbase-sdk-java-1.1/api-reference-summary.html&quot;&gt;http://www.couchbase.com/docs/couchbase-sdk-java-1.1/api-reference-summary.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
State that it&amp;#39;s an &amp;quot;Object value&amp;quot;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Looking deeper, it appears that the memcached methods inherited from spy use java.lang.object which leads to user confusion when trying to compare the two.</description>
                <environment></environment>
            <key id="22634">JCBC-245</key>
            <summary>Docs: Javadoc states that a java.lang.String is required for the value in a write operation, whereas online docs state object</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="http://www.couchbase.com/issues/images/icons/issuetypes/bug.png">Bug</type>
                                <priority id="1" iconUrl="http://www.couchbase.com/issues/images/icons/priorities/blocker.png">Blocker</priority>
                    <status id="5" iconUrl="http://www.couchbase.com/issues/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png">Resolved</status>
                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                    <security id="10011">Public</security>
                        <assignee username="daschl">Michael Nitschinger</assignee>
                                <reporter username="perry">Perry Krug</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:04:08 -0600</created>
                <updated>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:47:44 -0600</updated>
                    <resolved>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:47:44 -0600</resolved>
                            <version>1.1.2</version>
                                <fixVersion>1.1.3</fixVersion>
                                <component>library</component>
                                <votes>0</votes>
                        <watches>2</watches>
                                                    <comments>
                    <comment id="50163" author="perry" created="Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:23:56 -0600"  >Adding a library component since the Java docs show what the required type is, and if we are limiting to strings, we are preventing people from using these methods with non-string objects without writing their own transcoder which seems a little arduous in the simpler cases.</comment>
                    <comment id="50785" author="daschl" created="Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:11:50 -0600"  >That&amp;#39;s purely a lib bug, since those should also require Object instead of String.</comment>
                </comments>
                    <attachments>
                </attachments>
            <subtasks>
        </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    <customfield id="customfield_10081" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                <customfieldvalues>
                    <customfieldvalue>8769</customfieldvalue>
                </customfieldvalues>
            </customfield>
                                                                                    <customfield id="customfield_10181" key="com.atlassian.jira.ext.charting:timeinstatus">
                <customfieldname>Time In Status</customfieldname>
                <customfieldvalues>
                    
                </customfieldvalues>
            </customfield>
                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>