Couchbase Server

replace should allow a packet that doesn't have the expiration field

Details

  • Type: Improvement Improvement
  • Status: Resolved Resolved
  • Priority: Minor Minor
  • Resolution: Won't Fix
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: None
  • Component/s: couchbase-bucket
  • Security Level: Public
  • Labels:
    None

Description

We should be able to do a replace and use the current expiration time.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Chiyoung Seo added a comment -
Just for redistributing the bugs to the couchbase bucket team
Show
Chiyoung Seo added a comment - Just for redistributing the bugs to the couchbase bucket team
Hide
Permalink
Trond Norbye added a comment -
I don't understand the subject line here, but AFAIK the replace command in memcached operates according to the specification so I assume that this is regarding the implementation in ep-engine.
Show
Trond Norbye added a comment - I don't understand the subject line here, but AFAIK the replace command in memcached operates according to the specification so I assume that this is regarding the implementation in ep-engine.
Hide
Permalink
Mike Wiederhold added a comment -
This was a customer request. They want to be able to update a key without having to specify an expiration time. It will probably cause us to violate the memcached protocol which is why I marked it minor. It's potentially something we might not want to fix.
Show
Mike Wiederhold added a comment - This was a customer request. They want to be able to update a key without having to specify an expiration time. It will probably cause us to violate the memcached protocol which is why I marked it minor. It's potentially something we might not want to fix.
Hide
Permalink
Mike Wiederhold added a comment -
This was a customer request. They want to be able to update a key without having to specify an expiration time. It will probably cause us to violate the memcached protocol which is why I marked it minor. It's potentially something we might not want to fix.
Show
Mike Wiederhold added a comment - This was a customer request. They want to be able to update a key without having to specify an expiration time. It will probably cause us to violate the memcached protocol which is why I marked it minor. It's potentially something we might not want to fix.
Hide
Permalink
Chiyoung Seo added a comment -
We will revisit this issue if this is really a common use case.
Show
Chiyoung Seo added a comment - We will revisit this issue if this is really a common use case.

People

  • Assignee:
    Jin Lim
    Reporter:
    Mike Wiederhold
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved: