Couchbase
  • Why NoSQL?
  • Couchbase Server
  • Download
  • Resources
  • Careers
Home | Forums | Couchbase | Couchbase Server 2.0

Is CouchDB a good persistent layer for Membase?

1 reply [Last post]
  • Login or register to post comments
Mon, 08/29/2011 - 19:50
lennydizzy
Offline
Joined: 08/29/2011
Groups: None

Membase is great for social game due to it's low latency.
As I understand CouchDB is a MVCC system using b+ tree, with a focus on append only design.
(http://guide.couchdb.org/draft/btree.html)

One of the most important scenario of Membase is social game.
Social game has a lot of write operations (50+%).
And a good portion of them are in-place updates.
So why is CouchDB a suitable persistent layer for Membase?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Wed, 08/31/2011 - 07:11
jan
Offline
Joined: 02/15/2011
Groups: None

Hi Lenny,

thanks for writing.

CouchDB's internal data structures are not very far from SQLite's internal data structures conceptually, and SQLite is a great persistence store for Membase. CouchDB is even better as it allows dynamic queries as well as multi-master replication, two often asked for features.

Cheers
Jan
--

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Login
  • Register

Company

  • About Us
  • Leadership
  • Customers
  • Partners
  • Contact Us

Product

  • Couchbase Server
  • Couchbase SDKs
  • Use Cases
  • Documentation
  • Forums

Open Source

  • Couchbase Project
  • Couchbase vs. CouchDB

Commercial

  • Subscriptions & Support
  • Training & Services

News

  • Blog
  • Newsletter
  • Press Releases
  • Buzz

Follow Us

    
  • Customer Login
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Trademark Policy
  • Site Map

© 2013 COUCHBASE All rights reserved.

Sign in to Couchbase Community

close
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
You are logging into the Forums, Wiki and Issue Tracker